I woke up this morning wondering what new, inventive outrage the world has on the agenda today.
So, let’s see outrage number one:
Schenectady mayor considers options, martial law over police woes
Schenectady Police Chief Mark Chaires said, “This is unprecedented – all these officers getting in trouble at the same time for all these different reasons. …
… But it’s not just the threat of termination. Mayor Stratton told us he’s looking at all options, including disbanding the police department – basically starting over.
The mayor said there is another option – and that would be declaring martial law. The governor would have to declare it and then the National Guard would come in. The mayor said it’s more for a transition to a new police force if that were to happen.
He said, “It may be that as a stopgap measure, that you would need military forces – State Police, National Guard.”
Mayor Stratton said the temporary measure would last until the new police force took over.
Schenectady’s Corporation Counsel John Van Norden said, “If you abolish the police department you still have a need – not an obligation – but a need to police the community. You would need something in transition. Declaring martial law would be one way to bridge the gap.”
So that’s the first outrage I saw today while scannning the news. The idea of a city mayor tinkering with the idea of martial law because of the city’s corruption is incredible to me. How lightly, how easily we discuss the loss of our freedoms because that’s what martial law means. It means the limitation of everyone’s movements and freedoms to impose order on a populace.
The police chief of Schenectady, Chief Chaires, said it clearly. “When I think of martial law, I think of rioting. I think of Watts riots and things like that. I haven’t seen anything that rises to that level. I was a little surprised to hear that.”
Outrage number two comes from across the Atlantic:
UK population must fall to 30m, says Porritt
JONATHON PORRITT, one of Gordon Brown’s leading green advisers, is to warn that Britain must drastically reduce its population if it is to build a sustainable society.
Porritt’s call will come at this week’s annual conference of the Optimum Population Trust (OPT), of which he is patron.
The trust will release research suggesting UK population must be cut to 30m if the country wants to feed itself sustainably.
Porritt said: “Population growth, plus economic growth, is putting the world under terrible pressure.
“Each person in Britain has far more impact on the environment than those in developing countries so cutting our population is one way to reduce that impact.” …
However, Porritt is winning scientific backing. Professor Chris Rapley, director of the Science Museum, will use the OPT conference, to be held at the Royal Statistical Society, to warn that population growth could help derail attempts to cut greenhouse gas emissions.
So, this is Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s “leading green advisors”, is he? This man just suggested that 50% of Britian’s estimated 61 million people be eliminated somehow in the name of saving the environment.
Just how does this land lover aim to achieve this? Perhaps like Prince Phillip, the Queen’s husband, Porritt would like to reincarnate as a virus and kill 90% of the global human population.
His reasoning is about as perverse as it gets. In order to have “sustainable” “healthy” living in Britain, you have to eliminate, liquidate, get rid of, deport, kill or eugenically abort HALF OF THE BRITISH POPULATION so that the other half can live in peaceful commune with nature.
Somehow, the people advocating this don’t seem to believe that it will be them that’ll get the short end of the rope. Well, I suppose their chances are 50/50…
Third Outrage of the day:
U.S. Seeks Expanded Power to Seize Firms
The Obama administration is considering asking Congress to give the Treasury secretary unprecedented powers to initiate the seizure of non-bank financial companies, such as large insurers, investment firms and hedge funds, whose collapse would damage the broader economy, according to an administration document.
The government at present has the authority to seize only banks.
Giving the Treasury secretary authority over a broader range of companies would mark a significant shift from the existing model of financial regulation, which relies on independent agencies that are shielded from the political process. The Treasury secretary, a member of the president’s Cabinet, would exercise the new powers in consultation with the White House, the Federal Reserve and other regulators, according to the document.
The administration plans to send legislation to Capitol Hill this week. Sources cautioned that the details, including the Treasury’s role, are still in flux.
Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner is set to argue for the new powers at a hearing today on Capitol Hill about the furor over bonuses paid to executives at American International Group, which the government has propped up with about $180 billion in federal aid. Administration officials have said that the proposed authority would have allowed them to seize AIG last fall and wind down its operations at less cost to taxpayers.
Just so we’re absolutely clear about this.
The government who caused this financial crisis by allowing (ordering?) Fannie Mae and Fannie Mac give out sub-prime loans to people who can’t pay for them, who allowed the derivative game to get so out of hand that banks “leveraged” (lending out money they don’t have) our financial system into near bankruptcy, who passed a trillion dollar “stimulus bill” that NO ONE HAS READ, who specifically inserted the clause in the stimulus bill that gave AIG the right to hand out these hundred million bonuses even as they, our government, handed foreign billionaires roughly 200 billion dollars for free these past couple weeks… and that’s not yet talking about the $9 trillion dollars the Federal Reserve just printed and handed to God knows who?…
You want that government to have MORE POWER?!
Maybe I need to go watch Mary Poppins or The Sound of Music or eat some fruit–something to calm myself down in what looks like a deliberate and contrived collapse of my country.
Maybe some hot coffee or tea will help… but then again, did I expect the End of Days to be filled with virtue, piety and temperance? As Christians, we knew this was coming, and now here it is…
You may well ask, “What do we do?”
Pray. Pray and talk to Jesus like you life and soul depended on it… because it does. The devil may kill you in the end, but your soul will belong to Jesus, and who will pry you out of His Hand?
Scripture said that in the last days, the rich will pile and hoard wealth while denying the workers their wages even as Jesus approaches. Indeed, He is at the very door. Come Lord Jesus. Amen.
Dropping shoes
23 10 2009I thought I’d conduct a bit of a rambling commentary today about things that are, well, disturbing about our world.
In my previous posts earlier this year, I wrote on David Wilkerson’s vision of an impending calamity that would visit the United States and the world. He couched his letter to all believers in terms of our cities being engulfed in flames. Riots like the ones in Watts years ago will rampage across our country and the world because God’s wrath is upon us.
He advised all believers to put away a store of goods, a thirty-day supply of food and to pray earnestly for God’s direction whether to “run to the hills” or to hunker down. We are now in October heading into November and the signs on the horizon are a little more than disturbing.
We feel that our freedoms and liberties are being usurped by our government; we feel more tense, holding our breaths when whispers of calamities are heard but not seen around the corner; when conflagrations spark in a foreign land, we wonder if those fires will start wafting our way.
We are stepping on emotional pins and needles, or eggshells if you rather. Racial relations seem to be fraying at the edges not in small part due to how easily our leaders and prominent men and women thrust around accusations of racism. A lot of us feel we SHOULD look over our figurative shoulders but are afraid of what we might find standing there. We’re waiting for the other shoe to drop, and many of us aren’t sure what will happen or what WE’LL DO if it does.
So, what do I mean when I speak of the other shoe dropping?
Let me give you an example. With almost everyone I know, when I talk to them alone confesses to me their fear that the world is going to end– soon. We usually speak in hushed whispers, somewhat self-conscious of the possibility that others within hearing distance may stamp us as hysterical la-la lunatics. What they don’t know is that I’ve usually had a similar conversation with the other person a week or a couple months ago.
Even self-professed atheists confess to being afraid that the world is going to end soon, and many of those brushing off these fears say so with a conviction not derived from a supreme confidence that it won’t happen, but an urgent hope that it will not. Significantly, the atheists I encountered didn’t usually cite Global Warming as the cause of the fears. It’s usually something subterranean, shadowy, something nameless they can’t identify.
Many of them talk of December 21st, 2012, nuclear war, viral pandemics, mass starvation, mass deaths, etc. and this is reflected in our movies. 2012 the movie is about to be released next month, so is Cormac McCarthy’s The Road– both are hardly movies of holiday cheer.
In any case, we all sense that a major, tectonic shift is about to occur. What form it will take is not clear. I, for one, still hope for a Christian revival across America whatever happens to the rest of the world… I also don’t think it’s the Apocalypse just yet. These are just the beginning of our sorrows. Let no man deceive you by any means whatsoever, says the Good Book. These are but the birth pangs. The show could conceivably begin 20 years from now, regardless of what happens here in America.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Categories : Apocalypse, Commentary, End Times